In the March/April 2009 edition of Highlander Magazine there is an article written by Bowen Pearse entitled "The Lamont-Campbell Clan War of 1646". This article is written from a different historical perspective than any of the history I have seen.
Have any of you seen or read this article?
__________________
Jim Lovelace CLSNA Director - SE Region Georgia, Alabama & Tennessee Area Commissioner - CLSNA
I have not even heard of this magazine. Where did you find it? I looked online and found their website but not this article. http://www.highlandermagazine.com/ looks like one I want to get a subscription to
Good job Jim, finding more places for me to spend my grandchildrens inheritance !!
Jim can you scan the article and email to me? I doubt they would like us to post it to our site.
__________________
George Young CLSNA Senior VP Seanair agus Seannachie
even with giving credit to a publication that is putting us on thin ice. excerpts maybe... By the way I did not go to law school but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express recently
Jim L or Jim R scan and send to us po folk who don't have the subscription... please
__________________
George Young CLSNA Senior VP Seanair agus Seannachie
As many of you know we already reprint several Highlander Magazine articles as part of our standard arsenal of literature. I'm sure (hoping) that in the past someone contacted and was granted permission to reprint those articles.
If it's as good as has been stated I'll contact Highlanders media relations and see what it will take.
__________________
David Patton President Clan Lamont Society of North America
great article, good coverage of both sides of the centuries long squabble. Thanks David
I have seen lots written that religion was the cause but I don't think that was it. The reformation was well underway and both side had many people on both sides of that issue. I think it was two families living closely together for centuries with lots of intermarriages in both directions. Like a giant game of chess, who could marry more hieresses and grab title to the land or wealth.
I still contend that we Lamont's have no idea how those Campbell sheep crossed our fence rows and fell into our Bar - B - Que pits. Stupid Campbell sheep sheesh and we get all the blame because they wanted to end it all in a tasty method?
__________________
George Young CLSNA Senior VP Seanair agus Seannachie
Well we got a very polite no from Highlander Magazine.
Dear Mr. Patton:
Thank you for your kind words — I will pass them along to Bowen Pearse as well.
It wouldn’t make business sense for us to give the article away — I hope you understand. But if any of your members would like a copy of the March/April issue, they can write to us at the address below. It sells for $7, including first class postage. Alternatively, if any of your members subscribe now, that issue could be included as part of the annual subscription price. Members can telephone 800 607-4410 to subscribe or do it online at HighlanderMagazine.com
Thanks again for your note; we are delighted to know we struck a responsive note with Clan Lamont!
Best wishes,
Neill Kennedy Ray Editor & Publisher The Highlander Magazine
That being said, we tried and it's still a fantastic publication. Anybody who doesn't subscribe should.
__________________
David Patton President Clan Lamont Society of North America
Hi folks It was last year that Bowen Pearce contacted me about an article he was writing for the Highlander. I supplied him with the pictures and some of his material for the article. I have his copy of the article which I thought was different but good. Didn't think it would cause such a stir amongst us Lamonts. Bowen is an author and photographer. About two years ago a lady author contacted me for information about the Lamonts for an article for the highlander mag. I never heard from her again. I too subscribe to the mag. Best wishes from Mary Lamb Secretary CLS Scotland
I read the article with much interest. Then I read it again.
I could of course be totally wrong here, but perhaps you or someone else could check my logic. If I understand correctly, the good Mr Pearse would have us believe that the Lamonts, who supported Montrose shortly after the execution of Charles I in 1949, went on a spree of deceit, murder and mayhem directed mostly at Campbells.
So he seems to be suggesting that the Campbells, in 1946, were merely taking revenge for events that are alleged (not proven in a court of law) to have taken place some 3 years later.
I have seen this instance written before about this dark side of the Lamont history. The Lamonts like many other Scottish clans loved to fight, if we did not have any English (sorry Sandy) to kick around we fought amongst ourselves. There are several recorded instances of Lamont aggression but never to the numbers of that June date in 1646 by the Campbells.
We had the entire Cowal peninsula from very early in the Dalriada invasion. As time moved on it became more crowded (insert here - Campbells moving in). Just as today, the closer quarters we human occupy.... the more violence. It also was family quabbles since the Lamonts and Campbells had many marriages in both directions that lead to lands being exchanged via inheritance of daughters shifting to the other side.
In raping up my blabbering, I don't feel we are totaly innocent. We picked very often the losing side (not the wrong side) in Scottish Politics and paid the price to the more politically astute Campbells
__________________
George Young CLSNA Senior VP Seanair agus Seannachie
Sandy is about as Scots as it gets, along with Jock, Hamish (my son's name) and Dugal.
But getting back to the article. ..There's no doubt that the Lamonts committed some pretty dark deeds. What I'm getting at though is that the article seems to claim that the Campbell's deeds of 1946 were in revenge for Lamonts' deeds of 1949.